Sunday, June 25, 2006
All the Classified Information that's Fit to Print
Well, the New York Times has once again done great harm to our fight against terrorists by publishing details of another classified program.
Here are some links to reactions from the blogosphere:
Hugh Hewitt: "Bill Keller. The real decider-in-chief."
Glenn Reynolds: "NATIONAL SECURITY? THAT'S FOR US TO DECIDE, BUB. We're newspapermen!"
Ed Morrissey: "The New York Times apparently wants to stage itself as a publication written by traitors for an audience of idiots."
Scott Johnson: "I sincerely regret my vote for Bill Keller for president, but there you have it."
UPDATE: Check out Sgt. T. F. Boggs' letter to the NY Times.
Here are some links to reactions from the blogosphere:
Hugh Hewitt: "Bill Keller. The real decider-in-chief."
Glenn Reynolds: "NATIONAL SECURITY? THAT'S FOR US TO DECIDE, BUB. We're newspapermen!"
Ed Morrissey: "The New York Times apparently wants to stage itself as a publication written by traitors for an audience of idiots."
Scott Johnson: "I sincerely regret my vote for Bill Keller for president, but there you have it."
UPDATE: Check out Sgt. T. F. Boggs' letter to the NY Times.
Wednesday, June 07, 2006
"Unchecked" Speech
Gotta love the United Nations. Deputy Secretary General Mark Malloch Brown is upset because the U.S. government fails to defend the corrupt U.N. from its American critics such as Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.
The story has been widely discussed in the blogosphere, see Hugh Hewitt and Captain's Quarters for examples. The quote in this paragraph is particularly revealing:
Perhaps Malloch Brown would like to see a brutal crackdown on free speech in the U.S. as is common in so many of the UN member states. You know, the ones that are well-represented on the UN Human Rights Council.
The story has been widely discussed in the blogosphere, see Hugh Hewitt and Captain's Quarters for examples. The quote in this paragraph is particularly revealing:
In a highly unusual instance of a United Nations official singling out an individual country for criticism, Mr. Malloch Brown said that although the United States was constructively engaged with the United Nations in many areas, the American public was shielded from knowledge of that by Washington's tolerance of what he called "too much unchecked U.N.-bashing and stereotyping."
Perhaps Malloch Brown would like to see a brutal crackdown on free speech in the U.S. as is common in so many of the UN member states. You know, the ones that are well-represented on the UN Human Rights Council.
Monday, June 05, 2006
Tinfoil Crowd Needs to Go Back to the Drawing Board
This study is very bad news for paranoid moonbats trying to prevent Karl Rove from using radio signals to read and/or influence their thoughts. Here's the abstract:
Among a fringe community of paranoids, aluminum helmets serve as the protective measure of choice against invasive radio signals. We investigate the efficacy of three aluminum helmet designs on a sample group of four individuals. Using a $250,000 network analyser, we find that although on average all helmets attenuate invasive radio frequencies in either directions (either emanating from an outside source, or emanating from the cranium of the subject), certain frequencies are in fact greatly amplified. These amplified frequencies coincide with radio bands reserved for government use according to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). Statistical evidence suggests the use of helmets may in fact enhance the government's invasive abilities. We speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for this reason.
